Summer Progress Update: Volunteer Wetland Monitoring Program

aaron.ellis • July 21, 2025

June monitoring weathered the storms

We’re pleased to share a major milestone in the growth of the Volunteer Wetland Monitoring Program. This summer, we completed the first full monitoring cycle at four new wetland sites across North and South Carolina — bringing our total to seven

active monitoring locations.


These new sites reflect the rich diversity of wetland ecosystems in our region:

  • A rare mountain bog at Kanuga in Hendersonville, NC
  • An urban wetland at Riverbanks Zoo and Garden in Columbia, SC
  • Expansive Carolina Bays at Lewis Ocean Bay Heritage Preserve in North Myrtle Beach, SC
  • A large vernal pool at Horseshoe Farm Preserve in Raleigh, adding to our Piedmont network


Speaking of our Piedmont sites, recent storms brought significant flooding to Mason Farm Biological Reserve, and we have not yet been able to access the site to assess conditions. We’ll share updates as soon as we can. In contrast, Hemlock Bluffs and Robertson Millpond weathered the storms well and had an excellent turnout of volunteers for summer monitoring—thank you for your continued dedication and resilience!


At each site, volunteers collected data on groundwater levels, hydrology, amphibian activity, vegetation, and invasive species—building the foundation for long-term ecological insights.


This success would not have been possible without our exceptional volunteers. We were thrilled to welcome both new and returning participants, including master naturalists, biologists, environmental professionals, and dedicated citizen scientists. Despite extreme summer heat—and even a thunderstorm at Kanuga—our teams showed up ready to do the work, and we’re deeply grateful for their commitment.


A special highlight this season: Seana Finn and lead site volunteer Daphne Vogelsang partnered with the NC League of Conservation Voters to record a wetland monitoring demonstration that reached a broad audience through social media. Their passion and outreach are helping raise awareness about the value of community-driven science.


Looking ahead, we’ll be focused on data processing and quality checks over the coming weeks. If you’re interested in supporting this effort—especially in behind-the-scenes roles—we’d love to hear from you. Many of these tasks can be done in a cooler setting (think: air conditioning), and offer a great way to get involved. Please contact Aaron at aaron.ellis@carolinawetlands.org to learn more.



As we continue to witness the impacts of climate change, wetland monitoring becomes more critical than ever. Wetlands offer natural protection against flooding, filter stormwater runoff, and support biodiversity—and your involvement helps ensure these benefits are recognized and protected.


Thank you for being part of this growing effort.


You might also like

Celebrating Our Carolina Wetlands

Federal Rule Would Strip Protections from Many Wetlands and Streams

By kim.matthews • October 7, 2026
On September 9, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) offering additional ways to define “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). Why this definition matters The WOTUS definition determines which water bodies the federal government can protect under the Clean Water Act. In November 2025, the agencies proposed revisions to bring the definition in line with the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. EPA. After taking public comments, they have now put forward further options. The new proposal narrows federal jurisdiction even more, potentially stripping protections from the vast majority of U.S. wetlands and seasonal streams. What our comment letter says The Carolina Wetlands Association is submitting comments opposing the proposal. Our main concerns: It would undermine the Clean Water Act’s purpose. The law’s goal is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waters. This proposal would severely undercut that goal. The “days of water” test is a poor measure. The proposal decides jurisdiction by how many days a year water is present. That number correlates poorly with a waterway’s ability to carry pollution downstream to the rivers, lakes, and estuaries that would stay protected. Streams dry for as few as 30 days a year could lose protection, and polluters would have an incentive to discharge into them rather than into protected waters. Drinking water is at risk. About 56% of North Carolina’s stream miles feeding public drinking water systems are intermittent, ephemeral, or headwater streams. In South Carolina the figure is 51%. These systems serve 6.6 million people, who would bear higher health risks and treatment costs. Wetlands do critical work. They filter pollutants and nutrients that cause algal blooms, dead zones, and fish kills. Losing that function would also degrade groundwater, which many people drink untreated. The legal reasoning is flawed. We argue the agencies misread the Supreme Court’s language. “Relatively permanent” describes geographic features such as streams with defined beds and banks. The word “continuously” modifies “flowing” and doesn’t limit what counts as relatively permanent. It would be hard to implement. Many affected streams have no data showing how many days they lack surface water. That makes the rule difficult for agencies to administer and leaves landowners unable to tell whether the Clean Water Act applies to their property. The impacts haven’t been analyzed. The agencies should not finalize a rule before measuring the added pollution flowing from newly unprotected waters into those that supply drinking water, or projecting the resulting damage to downstream uses. What you can do Read the SNPRM Submit your comment by October 9, 2026, under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW-2025-0322 . Personal stories about the streams, wetlands, and drinking water you depend on are especially effective. Learn more: read the comments we submitted on the November 2025 version of the rule, many of which still apply.

Meet our new Board Members

By kim.matthews • September 2, 2026
Welcoming New Members to the Carolina Wetlands Association Board
Forested wetland with surface water present

Wetlands: Nature’s Hidden Defense Against Drought

By rick.savage • August 3, 2026
North and South Carolina is starting to recover from one of the most severe droughts in recent history. Drought covered essentially both states with reservoirs like Falls Lake and Jordan Lake dropping well below normal and cities including Raleigh and Durham enacting mandatory water restrictions. While the drought is largely over (given the second wettest July on record), I still think it is important to understand how wetlands mitigate droughts because the bottom line is drought impacts would be a lot worse without wetlands.